By Jeff Gahris
I have long enjoyed winter woodland restoration projects, removing invasive honeysuckles and buckthorn. This work is critical if we want thriving oak forests in DuPage County. But I have often asked myself, why do we have to burn all of this biomass? Given the release of carbon and various air contaminants, I ask: Is there a better way?
A burn in progress at Churchill Woods Forest Preserve |
Meanwhile, there is a growing interest in biochar. Biochar
is simply wood that is reduced to carbon by incompletely burning, often in an
oxygen-starved combustion unit (pyrolysis). It can be used as a soil amendment
in agriculture and a means to permanently sequester carbon to address the
climate crisis.
Biochar from invasive plants is being studied in China to
use as a soil amendment in grassland restoration projects to help restore soil
health. However, studies have shown limitations in using biochar as a soil
amendment, depending on the situation. Often, the microbiology in soils is not
enhanced by the application of biochar, and plants may not respond to its
presence.
Locally, there is growing interest in receiving carbon
credits for planting trees, restoring natural areas, and conserving existing
natural areas. There is even a nonprofit carbon registry called City Forest
Credits that manages the purchase of carbon offsets for local municipalities
and land preservation organizations. I’m intrigued by the possibilities,
knowing that we can meaningfully measure how much carbon is absorbed by current
conservation and restoration efforts by public and private landowners. Given
that carbon is released from burn piles, another intriguing opportunity would
be to start a pilot-scale biochar project in northeast Illinois. Between tree
trimming and invasives removals, we certainly have enough feedstock for a
biochar operation.
I am interested in your ideas on this complex topic and look
forward to hearing from you. Send me an email to jgahris@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment